docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this fi… #44

gautegf · 2025-10-26T21:56:57Z

Issue number

Closes #43

Description

Added JSdocs at the top of the file

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Removed an inline comment from internal code for improved maintainability.

coderabbit · 2025-10-26T21:57:16Z

Walkthrough

Removed an inline comment from the poll function within the vector-change watcher in the persistence module. No functional or behavioral changes; the control flow and logic remain identical.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Comment cleanup `src/AnnotationControl/persistence.js`	Removed inline comment from poll function in vector-change watcher

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A comment removed from the watcher's sight,
No code was changed, the logic stays tight,
Just whispers erased, the function runs clear,
Cleaner and leaner, the persistence is here! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (4 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request title claims to "Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this file," which suggests documentation additions. However, the raw summary explicitly states the only change is a "Minimal, cosmetic change: removed an inline comment from the poll function." This is a significant discrepancy—the title describes adding JSdocs while the actual change involves removing a comment, not adding documentation. The title therefore appears misleading about what the PR actually accomplishes, as the raw summary makes no mention of JSdocs being added.	Verify the actual changes in the pull request to determine if JSdocs were indeed added. If only a comment was removed, update the PR title to accurately reflect the actual change (e.g., "docs(#43): Remove inline comment from poll function in persistence.js"). If JSdocs additions are present but missing from the raw summary, provide complete details of all changes made.
Linked Issues Check	⚠️ Warning	Issue #43 requires adding JSdocs to the persistence file. The PR title and description claim to have added JSdocs at the top of the file, which aligns with the issue objective. However, the raw summary contradicts this by describing only a minimal comment removal with no mention of JSdocs additions. This creates uncertainty about whether the primary requirement of the linked issue has actually been met.	Verify that JSdocs have been properly added to the file as required by issue #43. If the raw summary is incomplete, provide a complete change summary showing the JSdocs additions. If only a comment was removed, update the PR to include the JSdocs additions that fulfill the issue requirements.
Out of Scope Changes Check	⚠️ Warning	The raw summary indicates the only change is removing an inline comment from the poll function, which is a cosmetic change. However, the stated objective of linked issue #43 is to add JSdocs to the persistence file. A comment removal does not fulfill this objective and appears to be outside the scope of what was requested. The change should focus on adding documentation, not removing existing comments.	Ensure all changes align with the issue objectives. Remove the out-of-scope comment removal or clarify whether it's a necessary preparatory change for adding JSdocs. The PR should focus on fulfilling the primary objective of adding JSdocs to the file.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description includes the required issue number ("Closes #43") and provides a brief description of the changes. However, the description is minimal and the "Testing steps" section from the template is completely missing. While testing steps may seem less critical for a documentation-focused change, the template explicitly includes this section as part of the standard format.

✨ Finishing touches

📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch 43-add-jsdocs-to-the-persistence-file

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9284341 and 722c15d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/AnnotationControl/persistence.js (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/AnnotationControl/persistence.js (3)

1-10: Well-structured module documentation.

The module-level JSDoc provides a clear overview of the annotation persistence functionality, including key features and a practical usage example. This will help developers quickly understand the module's purpose and how to use it.

12-25: Accurate and comprehensive function documentation.

The JSDoc accurately describes all parameters and return types. The function signature documentation correctly reflects the five API methods returned by initAnnotationPersistence, with proper typing for async methods and optional parameters.

283-283: Clarify the unmentioned comment removal.

The PR description states this change "adds JSDoc comments at the top of the persistence file," but the AI-generated summary indicates an inline comment was removed from this line. This removal is not mentioned in the PR objectives.

Can you clarify whether the comment removal was intentional? If it contained useful context about the 90-frame polling window, consider restoring it or incorporating that information into the JSDoc above the function.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

franmagn

LGTM!

mariewah

LGTM :D

docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this file does

722c15d

gautegf self-assigned this Oct 26, 2025

gautegf linked an issue Oct 26, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request

Add JSdocs to the persistence file #43

Closed

franmagn approved these changes Oct 27, 2025

View reviewed changes

mariewah self-requested a review October 27, 2025 08:30

mariewah approved these changes Oct 27, 2025

View reviewed changes

gautegf merged commit 0a567a2 into dev Oct 27, 2025
2 checks passed

docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this fi… #44

docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this fi… #44

gautegf commented Oct 26, 2025 •

edited by coderabbit bot

Loading

coderabbit bot commented Oct 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

franmagn left a comment

mariewah left a comment

docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this fi… #44

docs(#43): 📝 Add JSdocs describing what the functions in this fi… #44

Conversation

gautegf commented Oct 26, 2025 • edited by coderabbit bot Loading

Issue number

Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbit bot commented Oct 26, 2025 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Poem

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

franmagn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mariewah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

gautegf commented Oct 26, 2025 •

edited by coderabbit bot

Loading

coderabbit bot commented Oct 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading